in Re: Rio Queen Citrus, Inc. and Elmore Stahl, Inc.
This text of in Re: Rio Queen Citrus, Inc. and Elmore Stahl, Inc. (in Re: Rio Queen Citrus, Inc. and Elmore Stahl, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-08-00588-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________
JESUS MENDOZA, Appellant,
v.
JUSTICE OF THE PEACE ISMAEL "MELO" OCHOA, Appellee. _____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Jesus Mendoza, attempts to appeal an order denying appellant’s petition
to remove from office Justice of the Peace, Precinct 3, Place 2, Ismael Ochoa, entered on
June 26, 2008. On December 23, 2008, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant it did not appear that this Court has jurisdiction and that the appeal was subject to dismissal, unless
within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant corrected the defect.
The appellant responded on January 5, 2009, filing a “Motion to Proceed on this
Appeal.” The appellant asserts that this Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal of a denial
of a petition for citation to remove a judge from office where concrete, specific, and
conclusive evidence supports the claim that the trial judge engaged in judicial misconduct.
This Court does not have jurisdiction. An appeal may not be taken from a dismissal
of a petition to remove an elected judge where the trial court refused to issue citation. See
TEX . LOC . GOV’T CODE ANN . §87.016 (Vernon 1999). Accordingly, appellant’s motion to
proceed is DENIED and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF
JURISDICTION. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 21st day of May, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Rio Queen Citrus, Inc. and Elmore Stahl, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rio-queen-citrus-inc-and-elmore-stahl-inc-texapp-2009.