In re Riley
This text of 402 N.E.2d 975 (In re Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT
Comes now the Respondent and petitions this Court to be reinstated as an attorney before the bar of this State and comes now the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court and, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 18, submits to this Court findings of fact and a recommendation by the majority of the participating members for reinstatement.
This Court being duly advised now adopts and accepts as its own the findings of fact submitted by the majority of participating members of the Disciplinary Commission and, accordingly, further finds that the Respondent should be reinstated to the practice of law in this State.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by this Court that the Respondent in this cause, Michael Riley, is reinstated as an attorney in the State of Indiana.
The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to all attorneys of record, the Respondent, and all persons who were furnished the Order of Suspension.
Costs of this proceeding are assessed against the Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
402 N.E.2d 975, 75 Ind. Dec. 267, 1980 Ind. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-riley-ind-1980.