in Re: Rigoberto Salinas and Pamela Salinas
This text of in Re: Rigoberto Salinas and Pamela Salinas (in Re: Rigoberto Salinas and Pamela Salinas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-05-407-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE: RIGOBERTO SALINAS AND PAMELA SALINAS
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Yañez, Castillo, and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam[1]
Relators, Rigoberto Salinas and Pamela Salinas, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief in the above cause on June 28, 2005, requesting this Court to direct the Honorable Leticia Lopez, presiding judge of the 389th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, to vacate her order denying relators= motion to compel the deposition of David Rogers. This Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are DENIED.[2]
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 7th day of July, 2005.
[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
[2] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Rigoberto Salinas and Pamela Salinas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rigoberto-salinas-and-pamela-salinas-texapp-2005.