In re Rigg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Rigg

252 A.2d 398, 53 N.J. 601, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 282

DecidedMay 5, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.2d 398 (In re Rigg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rigg, 252 A.2d 398, 53 N.J. 601, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 282 (N.J. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Ctjeiam.

Respondent is involved in a number of disciplinary charges which, in the main, seem to stem from an inability to cope with the responsibilities of the profession. It had been our hope that the underlying difficulty could be resolved without the imposition of discipline, hut respondent proved unequal to the opportunity we afforded him. We are compelled to conclude that respondent must he suspended [602]*602indefinitely, with leave to apply for reinstatement upon satisfactory proof that he has regained the capacity to practice law with safety to his clients. The suspension shall take effect 30 days from the date of the filing of this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Ctjeiam.

Respondent is involved in a number of disciplinary charges which, in the main, seem to stem from an inability to cope with the responsibilities of the profession. It had been our hope that the underlying difficulty could be resolved without the imposition of discipline, hut respondent proved unequal to the opportunity we afforded him. We are compelled to conclude that respondent must he suspended [602]*602indefinitely, with leave to apply for reinstatement upon satisfactory proof that he has regained the capacity to practice law with safety to his clients. The suspension shall take effect 30 days from the date of the filing of this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.2d 398, 53 N.J. 601, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rigg-nj-1969.