In re Rifkin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Rifkin

57 A.3d 552, 212 N.J. 485

DecidedDecember 19, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.3d 552 (In re Rifkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rifkin, 57 A.3d 552, 212 N.J. 485 (N.J. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

RUTH A. RIFKIN of PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, and the Director of the Office of Attorney Ethics having submitted to the Court their consent that RUTH A. RIFKIN remain on disability inactive status pursuant to Rule 1:20-12, as ordered by the Court on December 22, 2004;

And it appearing that RUTH A. RIFKIN lacks the capacity to practice law;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RUTH A. RIFKIN remain on disability inactive status pursuant to Rule 1:20-12 until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that RUTH A. RIFKIN continue to be restrained from practicing law during the period that she remains on disability inactive status; and it is further

ORDERED that RUTH A. RIFKIN continue to comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with incapacitated attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI