In re Riely

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Riely

116 A.D.2d 612, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51476

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 17, 1986·Published

Opinion

Application by petitioner, by a suspended attorney and counselor-at-law, whose period of suspension has expired for his reinstatement to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

The matter is referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second Judicial Department to investigate and report (1) on whether petitioner has complied with this court’s order of suspension and (2) whether he presently possesses the character and fitness requisite to an attorney and counselor-at-law.

The petitioner’s application will be held in abeyance, pending the Committee’s report. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by petitioner, by a suspended attorney and counselor-at-law, whose period of suspension has expired for his reinstatement to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

The matter is referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second Judicial Department to investigate and report (1) on whether petitioner has complied with this court’s order of suspension and (2) whether he presently possesses the character and fitness requisite to an attorney and counselor-at-law.

The petitioner’s application will be held in abeyance, pending the Committee’s report. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.

In re Riely, 116 A.D.2d 612, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51476 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

116 A.D.2d 612 (In re Riely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.