In Re Rickye Bernard Henderson, Sr., Relator v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
DecidedFebruary 10, 2026
Docket07-26-00084-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Rickye Bernard Henderson, Sr., Relator v. the State of Texas (In Re Rickye Bernard Henderson, Sr., Relator v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Rickye Bernard Henderson, Sr., Relator v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-26-00084-CV

IN RE RICKYE BERNARD HENDERSON, SR., RELATOR

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

February 10, 2026 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PARKER, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

Rickye Bernard Henderson, Sr., Relator, filed documents with this Court seeking

a writ of mandamus directing the judge of the 353rd District Court of Travis County to

vacate certain orders and judgments issued against him. As we are without authority to

issue a mandamus against the respondent, we dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.

A court of appeals may issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or

county court in its geographic district and may issue writs necessary to enforce its

jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T. CODE § 22.221(a), (b). Here, Henderson has directed his

mandamus petition against a judge presiding over a district court which is not located

within the geographic district for the Seventh Court of Appeals. See TEX. GOV’T. CODE § 22.201 (d) (designating Travis County within the Third Court of Appeals District), (h)

(identifying the counties composing the Seventh Court of Appeals District). Accordingly,

we are without authority to issue a writ of mandamus against a judge of the 353rd District

Court unless the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T. CODE

§ 22.221(a). Henderson has not demonstrated that our jurisdiction is implicated here.

Therefore, we dismiss Henderson’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of

jurisdiction.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Rickye Bernard Henderson, Sr., Relator v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rickye-bernard-henderson-sr-relator-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp7-2026.