In re Ricker

New York Supreme Court

In re Ricker

89 Misc. 582, 153 N.Y.S. 701

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1915

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 Misc. 582 (In re Ricker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ricker, 89 Misc. 582, 153 N.Y.S. 701 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Cohalan, J.

Application for an order for the appointment of the Central Trust Company of New York as committee of the property within the state of an incompetent, adjudged- so without the state. The petitioner is now the committee of the person and the property appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction in the state of Massachusetts. Section 2326 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that she may be appointed the committee in this jurisdiction notwithstanding the fact that she is a nonresident. However, she is unwilling to assume that responsibility. The Central Trust Company is not unwilling to accept the appointment, but it has doubt as to the court’s power under section 2326 to appoint any one other than the foreign committee, and, further, as to whether the appointment of another person or corporation must proceed under section 2327 under the direction of the court by an inquisition before a jury. I do not think that the objections raised are all sufficient. The power of the court over property belonging to incompetents within its jurisdiction is broad and inherent. The owner of the property in this proceeding has been judicially declared an incompetent. This is conclusively established by an exemplified copy of a judicial record of a court of proper jurisdiction. This record and the decree which it proves are entitled to .full faith and credit in every state of the United States. Matter of Curtiss, 134 App. Div. 551; Matter of Neally, 26 How. Pr. 402. The status of the incompetent'being estab[584]*584lished, and the decree establishing it being a decree in rem, of which other courts must take cognizance, I am of opinion that there is no need in this court for an inquisition. An inquisition would be a mere empty form and a needless expense, as the fact of incompetence has been already established by a valid judicial record, adequately proved. As the foreign committee has refused to act, section 2326 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that in such circumstances the court may choose a resident committee. Matter of Bartelme, 34 Misc. Rep. 131. Under the circumstances and on the present papers the motion to appoint the Central Trust Company as committee of the incompetent’s property in this state is granted.

Application granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohalan, J.

Application for an order for the appointment of the Central Trust Company of New York as committee of the property within the state of an incompetent, adjudged- so without the state. The petitioner is now the committee of the person and the property appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction in the state of Massachusetts. Section 2326 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that she may be appointed the committee in this jurisdiction notwithstanding the fact that she is a nonresident. However, she is unwilling to assume that responsibility. The Central Trust Company is not unwilling to accept the appointment, but it has doubt as to the court’s power under section 2326 to appoint any one other than the foreign committee, and, further, as to whether the appointment of another person or corporation must proceed under section 2327 under the direction of the court by an inquisition before a jury. I do not think that the objections raised are all sufficient. The power of the court over property belonging to incompetents within its jurisdiction is broad and inherent. The owner of the property in this proceeding has been judicially declared an incompetent. This is conclusively established by an exemplified copy of a judicial record of a court of proper jurisdiction. This record and the decree which it proves are entitled to .full faith and credit in every state of the United States. Matter of Curtiss, 134 App. Div. 551; Matter of Neally, 26 How. Pr. 402. The status of the incompetent'being estab[584]*584lished, and the decree establishing it being a decree in rem, of which other courts must take cognizance, I am of opinion that there is no need in this court for an inquisition. An inquisition would be a mere empty form and a needless expense, as the fact of incompetence has been already established by a valid judicial record, adequately proved. As the foreign committee has refused to act, section 2326 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that in such circumstances the court may choose a resident committee. Matter of Bartelme, 34 Misc. Rep. 131. Under the circumstances and on the present papers the motion to appoint the Central Trust Company as committee of the incompetent’s property in this state is granted.

Application granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 Misc. 582, 153 N.Y.S. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ricker-nysupct-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack