In re Richardson

California Supreme Court

In re Richardson

123 P.2d 11, 20 Cal. 2d 894, 1942 Cal. LEXIS 349

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Richardson. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 Cal. 2d 536 →

California Supreme Court·Decided March 19, 1942·No. Crim. No. 4277·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

— It appearing upon investigation and report by The State Bar that the facts and circumstances surrounding the conviction of Jerome Lyman Richardson, on his plea of guilty in action No. 27812 in the District Court of the United States in and for the Northern District of New York, do not disclose moral turpitude to have been involved in the commission of the offense, the order to show cause heretofore issued herein is discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

— It appearing upon investigation and report by The State Bar that the facts and circumstances surrounding the conviction of Jerome Lyman Richardson, on his plea of guilty in action No. 27812 in the District Court of the United States in and for the Northern District of New York, do not disclose moral turpitude to have been involved in the commission of the offense, the order to show cause heretofore issued herein is discharged.

In re Richardson, 123 P.2d 11, 20 Cal. 2d 894, 1942 Cal. LEXIS 349 (Cal. 1942).

Pincite

123 P.2d 11 (In re Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.