In re Richardson

California Supreme Court

In re Richardson

20 Cal. 2d 894

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 19, 1942

DocketCrim. No. 4277

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Cal. 2d 894 (In re Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Richardson, 20 Cal. 2d 894 (Cal. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

— It appearing upon investigation and report by The State Bar that the facts and circumstances surrounding the conviction of Jerome Lyman Richardson, on his plea of guilty in action No. 27812 in the District Court of the United States in and for the Northern District of New York, do not disclose moral turpitude to have been involved in the commission of the offense, the order to show cause heretofore issued herein is discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

— It appearing upon investigation and report by The State Bar that the facts and circumstances surrounding the conviction of Jerome Lyman Richardson, on his plea of guilty in action No. 27812 in the District Court of the United States in and for the Northern District of New York, do not disclose moral turpitude to have been involved in the commission of the offense, the order to show cause heretofore issued herein is discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Cal. 2d 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-richardson-cal-1942.