In re Richards

Supreme Court

In re Richards

529 U.S. 1016, 120 S. Ct. 1454

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Richards. Read the opinion of the Court — 526 U.S. 1156 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 20, 2000·No. No. 99-8425·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

In re Richards, 529 U.S. 1016, 120 S. Ct. 1454 (2000).

Pincite

529 U.S. 1016 (In re Richards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related