In re Richard
104 F. 792, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97
This text of 104 F. 792 (In re Richard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Richard, 104 F. 792, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97 (E.D. Tenn. 1900).
Opinion
In Hosmer v. Jewett, 12 Fed. Cas. 543 (No. 6,713), Judge Hall said:
“Money delivered to the bankrupt in trust, if earmarked or separately kept and retained as trust property, to be delivered or paid over in the same bills or coin in which it was received by the bankrupt, would not pass under the assignment, but would be considered ‘trust property’; but an amount of money due from the bankrupt as trustee, and which could not be distinguished from any other moneys in his possession or under his control, or which was only due from him because he had used trust funds for his own purposes, or otherwise misapplied them, could not be considered as ‘property’ held by the bankrupt in trust.”
This is undoubtedly the settled rule upon the subject. Loveland, Bankr. p. 324, and cases there cited. It is quite evident, in view of the law thus declared, that the conclusions at which the referee arrived are correct. His report is accordingly confirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Hercules Service Parts Corp.
101 F. Supp. 455 (E.D. Michigan, 1951)
In re Larkin & Metcalf
202 F. 572 (D. South Dakota, 1912)
Crenshaw v. Allen
196 F. 292 (Ninth Circuit, 1912)
In re Bennett
153 F. 673 (Sixth Circuit, 1907)
In re Royea's Estate
143 F. 182 (W.D. Washington, 1906)
In re Woods & Malone
121 F. 599 (S.D. Georgia, 1903)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
104 F. 792, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-richard-tned-1900.