in Re Richard Leshin

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 15, 2013·No. 04-13-00279-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00279-CV

IN RE Richard LESHIN

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 15, 2013

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 29, 2013, Relator Richard Leshin filed a petition for writ of mandamus,

complaining of the portion of the trial court’s February 5, 2013 order that awarded sanctions

against Leshin. However, mandamus relief is only available if the relator establishes both the

trial court abused its discretion and relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. See In re

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 125 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Leshin has

failed to establish he lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. 2 Accordingly, the petition for writ of

mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-PB6-000081-L2, styled In the Matter of the Guardianship of Carlos Benavides, Jr., An Incapacitated Person, pending in the County Court at Law No. 2, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Jesus Garza presiding. 2 We note that Leshin has filed an appeal in Cause Number 04-13-00196-CV from the same order complained of in this proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Richard Leshin, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re Richard Leshin (in Re Richard Leshin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)