In re: Richard L. Denman

172 A.3d 392
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 2, 2017
Docket17-BG-229
StatusPublished

This text of 172 A.3d 392 (In re: Richard L. Denman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Richard L. Denman, 172 A.3d 392 (D.C. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Upon consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional Responsibility pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c), to suspend respondent indefinitely based on disability, and the Board's motion to file under seal, and it appearing that neither respondent nor Disciplinary Counsel has interposed an objection thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Board's motion to file under seal is granted; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED the respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately, and that any pending matters be held in abeyance pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(e) until further order of the court pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c). Respondent's reinstatement to the District of Columbia Bar shall be in accordance with the provisions of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(g); and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's attention is drawn to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 14 and 16, relating to suspending attorneys; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) with the court and the Board and shall serve a copy of the affidavit on Disciplinary Counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A.3d 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-richard-l-denman-dc-2017.