in Re Richard Chuba
This text of in Re Richard Chuba (in Re Richard Chuba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 2, 2012.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-12-00046-CV ____________
IN RE RICHARD CHUBA, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 113th District Court Trial Court Cause No. 2010-47535 Harris County, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On January 20, 2012, relator, a pro se inmate, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator complains the Honorable John Donovan, presiding judge of the 113th District Court of Harris County, is not his performing ministerial duties.
Relator claims the trial court has refused "to acknowledge" any filings in his civil suit filed in that court and has refused to make any ruling. Relator has not provided this court with copies of any motions on which he seeks a ruling. It is relator’s burden to provide this court with a record sufficient to establish his right to relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992); Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a).
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Christopher.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Richard Chuba, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-richard-chuba-texapp-2012.