in Re Richard Cheroske and David Penny
This text of in Re Richard Cheroske and David Penny (in Re Richard Cheroske and David Penny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-11-00175-CV
In re Richard Cheroske and David Penny
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TOM GREEN COUNTY
M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N
PER CURIAM
Because Relators have an adequate remedy by appeal, the petition for writ of
mandamus is denied and the motion for emergency relief is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose
Filed: March 31, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Richard Cheroske and David Penny, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-richard-cheroske-and-david-penny-texapp-2011.