in Re Richard Cheroske and David Penny

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 31, 2011·No. 03-11-00175-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00175-CV

In re Richard Cheroske and David Penny

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TOM GREEN COUNTY

M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N

Because Relators have an adequate remedy by appeal, the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied and the motion for emergency relief is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Filed: March 31, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Richard Cheroske and David Penny, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

in Re Richard Cheroske and David Penny (in Re Richard Cheroske and David Penny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.