in Re Richard Alan Haase
This text of in Re Richard Alan Haase (in Re Richard Alan Haase) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 25, 2011.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-10-00891-CV
IN RE RICHARD ALAN HAASE, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
240th District Court
Fort Bend, County, Texas
09-DCV-175011
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On September 20, 2010, relator, Richard Alan Haase, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann '22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. Relator asks this court to order the respondent, the Honorable Daniel R. Sklar, judge of the 240th District Court, Fort Bend County, Texas, to vacate his order dated August 25, 2010, ordering production of certain documents.
On January 14, 2011, real parties in interest, Pearl River Polymers, Inc., Polychemie, Inc., Polydyne, Inc., Chemtail, Inc., SNF Holding Company, SNF, Inc., Wright Brown & Close, LLP, and Provost Umphrey Law Firm, LLP filed a motion to dismiss the petition as moot because summary judgment was entered in favor of the real parties. In their motion, real parties represent that they no longer seek discovery of the documents and materials ordered produced by the trial court and at issue in this original proceeding. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Brown, and Christopher.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Richard Alan Haase, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-richard-alan-haase-texapp-2011.