in Re Richard Alan Haase

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 25, 2011·No. 14-10-00891-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 25, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00891-CV

____________

IN RE RICHARD ALAN HAASE, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

240th District Court

Fort Bend, County, Texas

09-DCV-175011

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 20, 2010, relator, Richard Alan Haase, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann '22.221; see  also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.  Relator asks this court to order the respondent, the Honorable Daniel R. Sklar, judge of the 240th District Court, Fort Bend County, Texas, to vacate his order dated August 25, 2010, ordering production of certain documents.

On January 14, 2011, real parties in interest, Pearl River Polymers, Inc., Polychemie, Inc., Polydyne, Inc., Chemtail, Inc., SNF Holding Company, SNF, Inc., Wright Brown & Close, LLP, and Provost Umphrey Law Firm, LLP filed a motion to dismiss the petition as moot because summary judgment was entered in favor of the real parties.  In their motion, real parties represent that they no longer seek discovery of the documents and materials ordered produced by the trial court and at issue in this original proceeding.  The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Brown, and Christopher.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Richard Alan Haase, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

in Re Richard Alan Haase (in Re Richard Alan Haase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.