In re Rich
175 A.D. 969
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1916·Published
Opinion
The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, on the ground that the only purpose for which the examination is sought is to enable the plaintiff to ascertain the exact amount due him. (See Cohn v. Hubert, 140 App. Div. 507.) Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Rich, 175 A.D. 969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
175 A.D. 969 (In re Rich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cohn v. Hubert
140 A.D. 507 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)