In re Rich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Rich

175 A.D. 969

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.D. 969 (In re Rich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rich, 175 A.D. 969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, on the ground that the only purpose for which the examination is sought is to enable the plaintiff to ascertain the exact amount due him. (See Cohn v. Hubert, 140 App. Div. 507.) Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, on the ground that the only purpose for which the examination is sought is to enable the plaintiff to ascertain the exact amount due him. (See Cohn v. Hubert, 140 App. Div. 507.) Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D. 969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rich-nyappdiv-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack