In re Rice

Fourth Circuit

In re Rice

589 F. App'x 188

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2015·No. No. 14-1973·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Dante Rice petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking immediate release from imprisonment after the district court vacated Rice’s sentence upon his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that [189] the district court held a resentencing hearing and Rice was released. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Dante Rice petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking immediate release from imprisonment after the district court vacated Rice’s sentence upon his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that [189] the district court held a resentencing hearing and Rice was released. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Rice, 589 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

589 F. App'x 188 (In re Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related