In re Rice
This text of 589 F. App'x 188 (In re Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Nathaniel Dante Rice petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking immediate release from imprisonment after the district court vacated Rice’s sentence upon his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that [189]*189the district court held a resentencing hearing and Rice was released. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
589 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rice-ca4-2015.