In re Riccio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Riccio

83 A.D.2d 970, 443 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15430

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Riccio. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 A.D.2d 687 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 10, 1981·Published

Opinion

Application by petitioner for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law. The application was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Fourth Judicial District which reported that petitioner is possessed of the requisite character and fitness to resume the practice of law. In addition, the Committee on Professional Standards of the Third Judicial Department has recommended that petitioner be reinstated. Application granted and petitioner reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law effective immediately. Order entered. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Casey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by petitioner for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law. The application was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Fourth Judicial District which reported that petitioner is possessed of the requisite character and fitness to resume the practice of law. In addition, the Committee on Professional Standards of the Third Judicial Department has recommended that petitioner be reinstated. Application granted and petitioner reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law effective immediately. Order entered. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Casey, JJ., concur.

In re Riccio, 83 A.D.2d 970, 443 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15430 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

83 A.D.2d 970 (In re Riccio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.