In re Riccardi

222 P. 625, 64 Cal. App. 791, 1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 239
California Court of Appeal·Decided December 10, 1923·No. Civ. No. 4642·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

TYLER, P. J.

This is an application for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law after disbarment.

From the record it appears that petitioner was convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude and sentenced to be imprisoned in the state penitentiary. After serving a portion of his sentence he was, on the twenty-fourth day of December, 1922, granted a full pardon by the Governor of the state. Attached to the petition are numerous testimonials from officials and other persons recommending the reinstatement of the applicant. On the other hand certain protests have been filed against such action. [1] The case presents the identical situation with which we were called upon to deal in the Matter of Darnel O’Connell, ante, p. 673 [222 Pac. 625], in which we denied a similar petition. Upon the authority of that case the petition herein is denied.

St. Sure, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Riccardi, 222 P. 625, 64 Cal. App. 791, 1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 239 (Cal. Ct. App. 1923).

222 P. 625 (In re Riccardi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Bar v. Riccardi
294 P. 537 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1931)
In re Egan
218 N.W. 1 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1928)