In re Riccardi

California Court of Appeal

In re Riccardi

222 P. 625, 64 Cal. App. 791, 1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 239

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 10, 1923

DocketCiv. No. 4642

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 222 P. 625 (In re Riccardi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Riccardi, 222 P. 625, 64 Cal. App. 791, 1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 239 (Cal. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

TYLER, P. J.

This is an application for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law after disbarment.

From the record it appears that petitioner was convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude and sentenced to be imprisoned in the state penitentiary. After serving a portion of his sentence he was, on the twenty-fourth day of December, 1922, granted a full pardon by the Governor of the state. Attached to the petition are numerous testimonials from officials and other persons recommending the reinstatement of the applicant. On the other hand certain protests have been filed against such action. [1] The case presents the identical situation with which we were called upon to deal in the Matter of Darnel O’Connell, ante, p. 673 [222 Pac. 625], in which we denied a similar petition. Upon the authority of that case the petition herein is denied.

St. Sure, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TYLER, P. J.

This is an application for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law after disbarment.

From the record it appears that petitioner was convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude and sentenced to be imprisoned in the state penitentiary. After serving a portion of his sentence he was, on the twenty-fourth day of December, 1922, granted a full pardon by the Governor of the state. Attached to the petition are numerous testimonials from officials and other persons recommending the reinstatement of the applicant. On the other hand certain protests have been filed against such action. [1] The case presents the identical situation with which we were called upon to deal in the Matter of Darnel O’Connell, ante, p. 673 [222 Pac. 625], in which we denied a similar petition. Upon the authority of that case the petition herein is denied.

St. Sure, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 P. 625, 64 Cal. App. 791, 1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-riccardi-calctapp-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack