In re Ricardo Z.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ricardo Z.

75 A.D.3d 606, 904 N.Y.S.2d 907

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 20, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 75 A.D.3d 606 (In re Ricardo Z.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ricardo Z., 75 A.D.3d 606, 904 N.Y.S.2d 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

In a juvenile de[607]*607linquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated June 4, 2009, as, upon a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Dane, J.), dated April 13, 2009, made upon the appellant’s admission, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted petit larceny, placed him on probation for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Inasmuch as the period of placement has expired, the issue raised on appeal has been rendered academic (see Matter of Ramon D., 70 AD3d 685, 686 [2010]; Matter of Crystal B., 63 AD3d 1056, 1057 [2009]; Matter of Joaquin J., 47 AD3d 630, 631 [2008]). Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a juvenile de[607]*607linquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated June 4, 2009, as, upon a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Dane, J.), dated April 13, 2009, made upon the appellant’s admission, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted petit larceny, placed him on probation for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Inasmuch as the period of placement has expired, the issue raised on appeal has been rendered academic (see Matter of Ramon D., 70 AD3d 685, 686 [2010]; Matter of Crystal B., 63 AD3d 1056, 1057 [2009]; Matter of Joaquin J., 47 AD3d 630, 631 [2008]). Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 A.D.3d 606, 904 N.Y.S.2d 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ricardo-z-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack