In Re Ricardo Fornesa v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 1, 2025·No. 01-25-00264-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued May 1, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00264-CV ——————————— IN RE RICARDO FORNESA, JR., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Ricardo Fornesa, Jr. has filed a petition for writ of mandamus,

requesting that we compel the trial court to rule on a “Motion for New Trial or

Rehearing due to Absence of Transcripts and Procedural Errors.”1

1 The underlying case is Ricardo Fornesa, Jr. v. Auto Club Indemnity Company, Paul R. Hill, and Clayton C. Dilday, cause number 23-DCV-301423, pending in the 268th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County, the Honorable Steve Rogers presiding. We deny mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Any pending

motions are dismissed as moot.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Gunn and Guiney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Ricardo Fornesa v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

In Re Ricardo Fornesa v. the State of Texas (In Re Ricardo Fornesa v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.