In re Ribowsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ribowsky

131 A.D.2d 287, 521 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48920

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 131 A.D.2d 287 (In re Ribowsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ribowsky, 131 A.D.2d 287, 521 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on [288]*288October 18, 1972. By order of this court dated December 18, 1986, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law pending the outcome of this motion.

On December 11, 1986, after a trial by jury, the respondent was convicted of perjury in the first degree (six counts) (Penal Law § 210.15), class D felonies, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (six counts) (Penal Law § 175.35), class E felonies, and conspiracy in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 105.05), a class A misdemeanor.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), upon his conviction of a felony, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and it is directed that the respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI