In re Rhoad

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Rhoad

657 S.E.2d 781, 376 S.C. 539, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 32

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided February 12, 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

JEAN H. TOAL, Chief Justice.

Respondent was suspended on November 5, 2007, for a period of ninety (90) days. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state,

s/ Daniel E. Shearouse Clerk

PLEICONES, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

JEAN H. TOAL, Chief Justice.

Respondent was suspended on November 5, 2007, for a period of ninety (90) days. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state,

s/ Daniel E. Shearouse Clerk

PLEICONES, J., not participating.

In re Rhoad, 657 S.E.2d 781, 376 S.C. 539, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 32 (S.C. 2008).

Pincite

657 S.E.2d 781 (In re Rhoad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.