In Re Rheinschild

California Court of Appeal

In Re Rheinschild

254 P. 931, 82 Cal. App. 16, 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 720

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 23, 1927

DocketDocket No. 5567.

StatusPublished

This text of 254 P. 931 (In Re Rheinschild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Rheinschild, 254 P. 931, 82 Cal. App. 16, 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 720 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Petitioner was admitted to the bar in 1909 and he was disbarred in 1919. He petitions for a reinstatement in the ranks of the profession.

[1] Petitioner has produced satisfactory and convincing evidence that he has conducted himself with the highest degree of honesty and integrity during the nearly eight years that have elapsed since he was deprived of his license to practice.

Upon the score of his mental qualifications, we are satisfied from the evidence that he has kept up a practically constant study of the law since his disbarment and that he is possessed of the necessary qualifications to entitle him to a reinstatement. *Page 17

These conclusions bring him within the rules stated in the opinions In re Stevens, 197 Cal. 408 [241 P. 88], and In reCate, 77 Cal.App. 495 [247 P. 231].

Petition granted.

Craig, J., and Thompson, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI