in Re Rhame & Gorrell Wealth Management, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 20, 2018
Docket09-18-00431-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Rhame & Gorrell Wealth Management, LLC (in Re Rhame & Gorrell Wealth Management, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Rhame & Gorrell Wealth Management, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-18-00431-CV _________________

IN RE RHAME & GORRELL WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC

________________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 18-10-13801 ________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In a mandamus petition, Rhame & Gorrell Wealth Management, LLC, argues

the trial court abused its discretion by allowing the real party in interest, Bogart

Wealth, LLC, to conduct discovery exceeding the limited discovery trial courts are

authorized to permit before ruling on motions to dismiss filed under the Texas

Citizen’s Participation Act. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 27.006(b)

(West 2015). Relator requests a stay of the trial court’s order allowing one

deposition, which requires Rhame & Gorrell to produce a corporate representative 1 and a list of clients that Bogart Wealth’s former employee, George Musselman,

contacted after he began working for Rhame & Gorrell. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(a).

To obtain mandamus relief, Rhame & Gorrell must show the trial court clearly

abused its discretion and that it has no adequate remedy by appeal. See In re

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding);

Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). On the

current record before us, we conclude that Rhame & Gorrell has failed to establish

the trial court clearly abused its discretion by ordering the discovery it now seeks to

avoid. Accordingly, Rhame & Gorrell’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See

Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Its motion for temporary relief is also denied as moot.

PETITION DENIED. PER CURIAM

Submitted on November 19, 2018 Opinion Delivered November 20, 2018

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Horton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Rhame & Gorrell Wealth Management, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rhame-gorrell-wealth-management-llc-texapp-2018.