in Re Rhame & Gorrell Wealth Management, LLC
This text of in Re Rhame & Gorrell Wealth Management, LLC (in Re Rhame & Gorrell Wealth Management, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
_________________
NO. 09-18-00431-CV _________________
IN RE RHAME & GORRELL WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC
________________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 18-10-13801 ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In a mandamus petition, Rhame & Gorrell Wealth Management, LLC, argues
the trial court abused its discretion by allowing the real party in interest, Bogart
Wealth, LLC, to conduct discovery exceeding the limited discovery trial courts are
authorized to permit before ruling on motions to dismiss filed under the Texas
Citizen’s Participation Act. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 27.006(b)
(West 2015). Relator requests a stay of the trial court’s order allowing one
deposition, which requires Rhame & Gorrell to produce a corporate representative 1 and a list of clients that Bogart Wealth’s former employee, George Musselman,
contacted after he began working for Rhame & Gorrell. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(a).
To obtain mandamus relief, Rhame & Gorrell must show the trial court clearly
abused its discretion and that it has no adequate remedy by appeal. See In re
Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding);
Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). On the
current record before us, we conclude that Rhame & Gorrell has failed to establish
the trial court clearly abused its discretion by ordering the discovery it now seeks to
avoid. Accordingly, Rhame & Gorrell’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See
Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Its motion for temporary relief is also denied as moot.
PETITION DENIED. PER CURIAM
Submitted on November 19, 2018 Opinion Delivered November 20, 2018
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Rhame & Gorrell Wealth Management, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rhame-gorrell-wealth-management-llc-texapp-2018.