In re Reynolds

787 S.E.2d 520, 416 S.C. 595, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 167
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 15, 2016·No. Appellate Case No. 2015-001574·Published

Opinion

ORDER

On November 27, 2013, this Court suspended petitioner from the practice of law for nine (9) months with conditions. In the Matter of Reynolds, 406 S.C. 356, 751 S.E.2d 662 (2013). Petitioner has now filed a Petition for Reinstatement pursuant to Rule 33 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

The Court grants the Petition for Reinstatement on the condition that petitioner extends his current monitoring contract with Lawyers Helping Lawyers for a period of one (1) year.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

s/Donald W. Beatty, J.

s/John W. Kittredge, J.

s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

s/John Cannon Few, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Reynolds, 787 S.E.2d 520, 416 S.C. 595, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 167 (S.C. 2016).

787 S.E.2d 520 (In re Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Reynolds
751 S.E.2d 662 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2013)