In re Reynolds

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Reynolds

787 S.E.2d 520, 416 S.C. 595, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 167

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJune 15, 2016

DocketAppellate Case No. 2015-001574

StatusPublished

This text of 787 S.E.2d 520 (In re Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Reynolds, 787 S.E.2d 520, 416 S.C. 595, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 167 (S.C. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On November 27, 2013, this Court suspended petitioner from the practice of law for nine (9) months with conditions. In the Matter of Reynolds, 406 S.C. 356, 751 S.E.2d 662 (2013). Petitioner has now filed a Petition for Reinstatement pursuant to Rule 33 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

The Court grants the Petition for Reinstatement on the condition that petitioner extends his current monitoring contract with Lawyers Helping Lawyers for a period of one (1) year.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

s/Donald W. Beatty, J.

s/John W. Kittredge, J.

s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

s/John Cannon Few, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI