In re Reynolds

Indiana Supreme Court

In re Reynolds

652 N.E.2d 68, 1995 Ind. LEXIS 102, 1995 WL 428370

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 12, 1995

DocketNo. 49S00-9503-DI-369

StatusPublished

This text of 652 N.E.2d 68 (In re Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Reynolds, 652 N.E.2d 68, 1995 Ind. LEXIS 102, 1995 WL 428370 (Ind. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER OF SUSPENSION UPON NOTICE OF CONVICTION

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10)(e), files a Notice of Conviction and Request for Suspension. And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that on June 6, 1995, pursuant to a plea agreement, the respondent was convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division, in Cause No. EV 98-26-CR, of two felony counts, Perjury Before the Federal Grand Jury, and Conspiracy to Defraud the Internal Revenue Service. We find further that, pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 23(11)(a), the respondent should be suspended from the practice of law pending further order of this Court or final determination of any disciplinary proceeding that may result.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Mark Eugene Reynolds is hereby suspended from the practice of law effective thirty (80) days from the issuance of this Order. Pursuant to Admis. Disc R. 28(11)(b), the respondent may, within 20 days of the issuance of this Order, assert in writing any deficiency that establishes that the suspension may not properly be ordered.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to send notice of this Order of Suspension as provided by Admis.Disc.R. 28(8)(d).

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER OF SUSPENSION UPON NOTICE OF CONVICTION

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10)(e), files a Notice of Conviction and Request for Suspension. And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that on June 6, 1995, pursuant to a plea agreement, the respondent was convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division, in Cause No. EV 98-26-CR, of two felony counts, Perjury Before the Federal Grand Jury, and Conspiracy to Defraud the Internal Revenue Service. We find further that, pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 23(11)(a), the respondent should be suspended from the practice of law pending further order of this Court or final determination of any disciplinary proceeding that may result.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Mark Eugene Reynolds is hereby suspended from the practice of law effective thirty (80) days from the issuance of this Order. Pursuant to Admis. Disc R. 28(11)(b), the respondent may, within 20 days of the issuance of this Order, assert in writing any deficiency that establishes that the suspension may not properly be ordered.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to send notice of this Order of Suspension as provided by Admis.Disc.R. 28(8)(d).

All Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

652 N.E.2d 68, 1995 Ind. LEXIS 102, 1995 WL 428370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reynolds-ind-1995.