In Re Rex
715 N.W.2d 862, 475 Mich. 884
This text of 715 N.W.2d 862 (In Re Rex) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In Re Rex, 715 N.W.2d 862, 475 Mich. 884 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
In re Randale Lashawn REX, Jr., and Quintae Najee Rex, Minors.
Department of Human Services, f/k/a Family Independence Agency, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Qiana L. Frank, Respondent-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 11, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
715 N.W.2d 862, 475 Mich. 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rex-mich-2006.