In re Revocation of Restaurant Liquor License No. R-11533

394 A.2d 676, 38 Pa. Commw. 596, 1978 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1449
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 27, 1978
DocketAppeal, No. 1029 C.D. 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 394 A.2d 676 (In re Revocation of Restaurant Liquor License No. R-11533) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Revocation of Restaurant Liquor License No. R-11533, 394 A.2d 676, 38 Pa. Commw. 596, 1978 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1449 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

On June 7, 1976, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (Board) issued an order suspending the restaurant liquor license of Edward J. and Kathryn Griffin (Licensees) for a period of three (3) days, effective July 1, 1976, “and thereafter until the licensees have corrected the unsanitary conditions which caused the citation to be issued.” On July 6, 1976, the Licensees served beer to a Board officer. As of that date, the license .in question had not been restored.1 Subsequently, a citation was issued against the Licensees for selling alcoholic beverages during a time when the license was suspended. After a hearing, the Board found that the averments in the cita[598]*598tion had been sustained and imposed a fine upon the Licensees of $350.00. An appeal was then taken to the Court of Common Pleas of the First Judicial District. After a hearing, that Court vacated the order of the Board. In its memorandum opinion the Court held that the Licensees had fully complied with the Board’s order, i.e., the conditions which caused the license to be suspended had been corrected and the premises had been closed for five (5) days (instead of three).

Even though there is evidence from which the learned trial judge could make the findings upon which he based his order to vacate the order of the Board, the fact remains that the Licensees sold alcoholic beverages at a time when they did not have a license, for whatever reason. Section 492(2) of the Liquor Code (Code), Act of April 12, 1951, P.L. 90, as amended, 47 P.S. §4-492(2), states:

It shall be unlawful—
(2) Sales of Malt or Brewed Beverages for Consumption on the Premises. For any person to sell to another for consumption upon the premises where sold or to permit another to consume upon the premises where sold, any malt or brewed beverages, unless such person holds a valid retail dispenser license or a valid liquor license issued by the board authorizing the sale of malt or brewed beverages for consumption upon such premises.

Hence, whether the alleged unsanitary conditions were corrected or not,2 the Licensees could not legally dispense alcoholic beverages until their license was physically restored.

[599]*599Accordingly, we must reverse.

Order

And Now, this 27th day of November, 1978, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of the First Judicial District of Pennsylvania, Trial Division, dated May 2, 1977, is reversed and the order of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, dated November 22, 1976, is reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement v. Cliff 1401 Corp.
669 A.2d 1087 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Pennsylvania State Police Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement v. D'Angio, Inc.
666 A.2d 1114 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Commonwealth v. Berresford
590 A.2d 1379 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
394 A.2d 676, 38 Pa. Commw. 596, 1978 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-revocation-of-restaurant-liquor-license-no-r-11533-pacommwct-1978.