In re Rettig

Supreme Court

In re Rettig

532 U.S. 918

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 19, 2001

DocketNo. 00-7895

StatusPublished

This text of 532 U.S. 918 (In re Rettig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rettig, 532 U.S. 918 (2001).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied, and petition for writ of common-law certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied, and petition for writ of common-law certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

532 U.S. 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rettig-scotus-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack