In re Restaino

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Restaino

117 A.3d 747, 222 N.J. 37, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 809

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 23, 2015·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that EMIL T. RESTAINO of RANDOLPH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months effective July 1, 2010, by Order of this Court filed June 3, 2010, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until further Order of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that EMIL T. RESTAINO of RANDOLPH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months effective July 1, 2010, by Order of this Court filed June 3, 2010, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until further Order of the Court.

In re Restaino, 117 A.3d 747, 222 N.J. 37, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 809 (N.J. 2015).

Pincite

117 A.3d 747 (In re Restaino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.