In re Restaino

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Restaino

737 A.2d 681, 162 N.J. 1, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 1380

DecidedSeptember 28, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 737 A.2d 681 (In re Restaino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Restaino, 737 A.2d 681, 162 N.J. 1, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 1380 (N.J. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that EMIL T. RESTAINO of RANDOLPH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years effective January 1, 1996, by Order of this Court dated November 30,1995, [2]*2be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until further Order of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that EMIL T. RESTAINO of RANDOLPH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years effective January 1, 1996, by Order of this Court dated November 30,1995, [2]*2be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until further Order of the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

737 A.2d 681, 162 N.J. 1, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 1380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-restaino-nj-1999.