In Re Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic

2020 Ark. 384
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 20, 2020·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Cite as 2020 Ark. 384 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 Opinion Delivered: November 20, 2020 PANDEMIC

PER CURIAM

In response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Supreme Court of Arkansas

delivered previous per curiam orders implementing emergency precautions to help protect

the public from unnecessary risks. On March 11, 2020, Governor Hutchinson declared

a “State of Emergency” for Arkansas related to the COVID-19 pandemic, which remains in

effect. The courts of the State of Arkansas have remained open and shall continue to remain

open. Today, we announce the following new protocols to maintain the safety

of jurors, litigants, attorneys, court personnel and the public.

Public health officials in Arkansas have identified an increase of COVID-19 positive

tests and hospitalizations. Therefore, we hereby suspend until January 15, 2021, jury trials

that have not begun. Jury trials that are currently ongoing shall be completed.

The Arkansas Supreme Court does not take lightly the decision to halt jury trials. It

weighs on this court that we are exposing the hundreds of citizen jurors around the state

who are being summoned to do their civic jury duty as well as increasing our court

personnel’s risk of daily exposure to the virus. The dramatic uptick in cases in Arkansas

requires us, as leaders of the state judiciary, to do our part to help protect Arkansans. This court emphasizes that, in the interest of justice, it is vital that judges continue to

move cases forward, either through the use of technology by virtual or telephonic hearings,

or through in-person hearings that meet the criteria for safe gatherings established by the

Arkansas Department of Health. While the safety of litigants, attorneys, court personnel,

and the public is of the utmost importance, it is critical to the proper functioning of the

courts that judges and attorneys work together on issues and cases that can be resolved, in

whole or in part, and that as many cases as possible continue to progress safely toward

resolution without undue delay.

Criminal matters, such as initial appearances, detention hearings, arraignments,

omnibus hearings, suppression hearings, plea hearings and sentencing hearings shall

continue to take place either by videoconference or in person, as scheduled by the presiding

judge. All civil hearings and other court proceedings shall take place either by

videoconference or in person, as scheduled by the presiding judge. This court expects courts

to hold court hearings through appropriate and safe means––preferably virtual and

telephonic (both on record)––for justice to occur.

Defendants are innocent until proven guilty in Arkansas. This court is mindful that

there are defendants awaiting trial beyond twelve months. We hereby order our criminal

courts to review their dockets for criminal cases that are outstanding for more than twelve

months where the defendant either did not receive bond or has not met bond and evaluate

whether there is any reason to reconsider bond. We are not requiring a new bond hearing in these cases, but rather the circuit courts should review the case and, if necessary, make any

adjustments if the situation supports it.

As it was announced by this court on March 17, 2020, for criminal trials, any delay

for speedy-trial purposes due to precautions against the COVID-19 pandemic shall

presumptively constitute good cause under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 28.3(h)

and shall constitute an excluded period for speedy-trial purposes. See In re Response to the

COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020 Ark. 116 (per curiam).

If any attorney, party, witness, or a member of their immediate family or household,

has an underlying medical condition that places them at higher risk for contracting COVID-

19, they may choose to participate remotely, preferably by videoconference, in a court

proceeding, and no further explanation shall be required. If the proceeding cannot be held

remotely, a continuance shall be granted.

This Order is to be interpreted broadly for protection of the public from the risks

associated with COVID-19. This Order applies statewide to all courts and court clerks’

offices except administrative courts of the executive branch, federal courts, and federal court

clerks’ offices.

It is so ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic, 2020 Ark. 384 (Ark. 2020).

2020 Ark. 384 (In Re Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryan Gadberry v. Autumn Gadberry
2023 Ark. App. 398 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2023)
Eugene Quackenbush v. State of Arkansas
2023 Ark. App. 58 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2023)
Jeffery Parsons v. Christina Parsons
2022 Ark. App. 493 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2022)
Allen v. State of Arkansas
W.D. Arkansas, 2022
Sharrah v. Damante
W.D. Arkansas, 2022
Nicholas Long v. State of Arkansas
2022 Ark. App. 69 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2022)
Chadwick Staggs v. State of Arkansas
2021 Ark. App. 259 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2021)
In Re Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic
2021 Ark. 30 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2021)
In Re Response to Covid-19 Pandemic (Jan. 5, 2021)
2021 Ark. 1 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2021)