In Re Response to Covid-19 Update

2020 Ark. 125
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 20, 2020
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 2020 Ark. 125 (In Re Response to Covid-19 Update) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Response to Covid-19 Update, 2020 Ark. 125 (Ark. 2020).

Opinion

Cite as 2020 Ark. 125 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE RISPONSE TO THE COVII)- Delivered: March 20. 2020 19 PANDEMIC

PERCURIAM In response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Supremc Court of Arkansas

issued a per curiam order on March 17, 2019, suspending in-penon court proceedings and

implementing emergency precautions to protect the public from unnecessary risks. k Re

Response to the COWD-|9 Pantlemic,2020 Ark. 116 (per curiam). Subsequently, Govemor

Hutchinson extended closures within the state due to the evolving nature of this pandemic

and public health officials' rccommendations to protect public safety. Today the Supreme

Court of Arkansas likewise announces additional measures to protect the public, including

the employees oFthe Arkansas judicial branch.

Effective March 19, 2020, at 5:00 p.m., theJustice Building in Little Rock closed to

the public and shall remain so until further notice. Notlvithstanding this closure, the Of6ce

ofthe Clerk ofthe Supreme Court and Court ofAppeals shall remain open. The previously

announced suspcnsion ofin-person proceedings in Arkansas's courts is hereby extended to

Friday, April 17,2020.

In addition to the existing authority of the Clerk of the Supreme Court and Coun

ofAppeals to grant 6ling extensions, the Clerk may also grant extensions in response to this

pandemic. A request for a filing extension will be granted by the Clerk if the grounds for thc extension relate to COVID-19 and the length of the extension is reasonable under the

circumstances. Such requests should indicate whether any opposing party has an objection.

This order is to be interpreted broadly for the protection ofthe public, including the

employees of the Arkansas judicial branch, Iiom the risks associated with COVID-19. This

order applies statewide to all courts and court clerks' offices except administrative courts of

the executive branch, federal courts, and federal court clerks' offices located in Arkansas.

It is so ORDEREI).

FOI]. THE COUI\T:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kinslow Young v. State of Arkansas
2024 Ark. App. 217 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2024)
Derrick Quijada v. State of Arkansas
2021 Ark. App. 321 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2021)
In Re Response to Covid-19 Pandemic: Eviction Filings
2020 Ark. 166 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2020)
In Re Response to Covid-19 Pandemic: Amendment to Court Rules
2020 Ark. 164 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2020)
In Re Response to Covid-19.april 3
2020 Ark. 132 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 Ark. 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-response-to-covid-19-update-ark-2020.