In Re Response to Covid-19

2020 Ark. 163
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 23, 2020
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2020 Ark. 163 (In Re Response to Covid-19) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Response to Covid-19, 2020 Ark. 163 (Ark. 2020).

Opinion

Cite as 2020 Ark. 163

SUPREME COITRT OF ARKANSAS Delivered: April 23, 2020

IN RE RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

PER CT'RIAM

In response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Supreme Court of Arkansas

delivered per curiam orders on March 17, March 20, and April 3, 2020, implementing

emergency precautions to help protect the public from unnecessary risks. See In re Response

to the COVID-19 Pandemic,2020 Ark. 116 (per curiam); In re Response to the COVID-I9

Pandemic,2020 frrk.125 (per curiam); In re Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic,2020 Ark.

132 (per curiarn). On April 16, President Donald Tiump released Guidelines for Opening

Up America Again to help guide state and local oflicials when reopening their locations.

Today, we announce additional measures to combat the spread of the disease to the public,

including the employees of the Arkansas judiciary.

The courts of the State ofArkansas shall remain open.The previous suspension of all

in-person proceedings in all appellate, circuit, and district courts shall be extended through

May 15, 2020, and may be extended by this court as circumstances warrant. All previously

announced suspensions and extensions from the court's earlier responses to the COVID-19

pandemic remain in eflect until further notice.

The excepted proceedings listed in the March 17 per curiam, In re Response to the

COVID-19 Pandentic,2)2) Ark. 116 ("emergency proceedings"), should continue to be held but only occur in-person if holding the proceeding remotely is not possible or feasible. If

emergency proceedings must be held in-person, the court should ensure that (1) no more

than 10 persons are gathered in the courtroom or in areas around the courtroom; (2)

participants wear face coverings where possible; and (3) participants in the courtroom are

separated consistent with social-distancing guidelines and other precautions. Non-

emergency proceedings should not be held in-person. With the ready availabiliry of video

conferencing and teleconferencing technologies, most proceedings can be conducted

remotely.There are no limitations on those remote proceedings so long as reasonable notice

and access is provided to the participants and the public. Judges shall remain mindful that

certain portions of hearings may be inappropriate for livestreaming to the public just as chey

would be inappropriate for public access in a physical courtroom.

This Order is to be interpreted broadly for protection of the public from the risks

associated with COVID-19. This Order applies statewide to all courts and court clerks'

oftlces except administrative courts of the executive branch, federal courts, and federal court

clerks' ofiices in Arkansas.

It is so ORDERED.

FORTHE COURT:

Kemp, Chief

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kinslow Young v. State of Arkansas
2024 Ark. App. 217 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2024)
Derrick Quijada v. State of Arkansas
2021 Ark. App. 321 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2021)
In Re Response to Covid-19 Pandemic: Amendment to Court Rules
2020 Ark. 164 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 Ark. 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-response-to-covid-19-ark-2020.