In re Resignation of Terbeek

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Resignation of Terbeek

987 N.E.2d 700, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1443

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 16, 2013

Docket2013-0069

StatusPublished

This text of 987 N.E.2d 700 (In re Resignation of Terbeek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Resignation of Terbeek, 987 N.E.2d 700, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1443 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

On January 9, 2013, respondent, Jeffrey Lee Terbeek, Attorney Registration No. 0033227, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio, who was admitted to the bar of this state on November 3, 1973, submitted an application for retirement or resignation pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VI(6)(A). The application was referred to disciplinary counsel pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VI(6)(B). On January 14, 2013, disciplinary counsel’s report was filed under seal with this court in accordance with Gov.Bar R. VI(6)(B)(2).

On consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that respondent’s application is denied. See Disciplinary Counsel v. Terbeek, 2013-Ohio-1912.

It is further ordered, sua sponte, that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, to respondent’s last known address.

It is further ordered that publication of this order be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2) and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On January 9, 2013, respondent, Jeffrey Lee Terbeek, Attorney Registration No. 0033227, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio, who was admitted to the bar of this state on November 3, 1973, submitted an application for retirement or resignation pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VI(6)(A). The application was referred to disciplinary counsel pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VI(6)(B). On January 14, 2013, disciplinary counsel’s report was filed under seal with this court in accordance with Gov.Bar R. VI(6)(B)(2).

On consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that respondent’s application is denied. See Disciplinary Counsel v. Terbeek, 2013-Ohio-1912.

It is further ordered, sua sponte, that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, to respondent’s last known address.

It is further ordered that publication of this order be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2) and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

987 N.E.2d 700, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-resignation-of-terbeek-ohio-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack