In re Resignation of Spencer

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Resignation of Spencer

802 N.E.2d 676, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1443

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 28, 2004

Docket2003-0732

StatusPublished

This text of 802 N.E.2d 676 (In re Resignation of Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Resignation of Spencer, 802 N.E.2d 676, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1443 (Ohio 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

On July 15, 2003, this court accepted the resignation of respondent, Scott W. Spencer, Attorney Registration No. 0019945, with disciplinary action pending. On September 22, 2003, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion for order to appear and show cause, requesting the court to issue an order directing respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be found in contempt for his failure [1444]*1444to comply with this court’s July 15, 2003 order. On November 14, 2003, this court granted that motion and advised respondent to file a written response by December 4, 2003. Respondent did not file a written response, and the court ordered respondent to appear in person on January 14, 2004. Respondent and movant appeared. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., dissent. Pfeifer, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On July 15, 2003, this court accepted the resignation of respondent, Scott W. Spencer, Attorney Registration No. 0019945, with disciplinary action pending. On September 22, 2003, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion for order to appear and show cause, requesting the court to issue an order directing respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be found in contempt for his failure [1444]*1444to comply with this court’s July 15, 2003 order. On November 14, 2003, this court granted that motion and advised respondent to file a written response by December 4, 2003. Respondent did not file a written response, and the court ordered respondent to appear in person on January 14, 2004. Respondent and movant appeared. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., dissent. Pfeifer, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

802 N.E.2d 676, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-resignation-of-spencer-ohio-2004.