In re Resignation of O'Neill

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Resignation of O'Neill

692 N.E.2d 1021, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1518, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1073

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 21, 1998

Docket97-2344

StatusPublished

This text of 692 N.E.2d 1021 (In re Resignation of O'Neill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Resignation of O'Neill, 692 N.E.2d 1021, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1518, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1073 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

On December 17, 1997, the court accepted the resignation of respondent, Michael James O’Neill, Attorney Registration No. 0047295, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio. On March 6, 1998, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion for an order to appear and show cause why respondent should not be held in contempt for failing to obey this court’s December 17, 1997 order. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and is hereby, granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before twenty [1519]*1519days from the date of this order why he should not be found in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this ease shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On December 17, 1997, the court accepted the resignation of respondent, Michael James O’Neill, Attorney Registration No. 0047295, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio. On March 6, 1998, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion for an order to appear and show cause why respondent should not be held in contempt for failing to obey this court’s December 17, 1997 order. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and is hereby, granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before twenty [1519]*1519days from the date of this order why he should not be found in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this ease shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

692 N.E.2d 1021, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1518, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-resignation-of-oneill-ohio-1998.