In Re R.E.S. and P.R.S. v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re R.E.S. and P.R.S. v. the State of Texas (In Re R.E.S. and P.R.S. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ————————————
No. 08-24-00350-CV ————————————
In re R.E.S. and P.R.S.
On Appeal from the 383rd District Court El Paso County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018DCM2671
JUDGMENT
The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against
the Honorable Lyda Ness Garcia, presiding judge of the 383rd District Court of El Paso County,
Texas, and concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be conditionally granted.
We therefore direct the trial court to vacate its new-trial order, reinstate the verdict, and proceed
in the normal course with the post-trial stages of litigation in accordance with the opinion of this
Court. The writ of mandamus will issue should the trial court fail to comply. IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of September 2025.
MARIA SALAS MENDOZA, Chief Justice
Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox, J., and Rodriguez, C.J. (Ret.) Rodriguez, C.J. (Ret.) (sitting by assignment)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re R.E.S. and P.R.S. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-res-and-prs-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.