In re Request for Increase in Insurance Premiums by National Automobile Underwriters Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In re Request for Increase in Insurance Premiums by National Automobile Underwriters Ass'n

184 So. 2d 901, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5759

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 1966

DocketNo. H-352

StatusPublished

This text of 184 So. 2d 901 (In re Request for Increase in Insurance Premiums by National Automobile Underwriters Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Request for Increase in Insurance Premiums by National Automobile Underwriters Ass'n, 184 So. 2d 901, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5759 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of Section 627.-391(3), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., the last clause of which is patently inconsistent with the first part of the section, Inter-venor’s motion to stay is granted. See Section 627.031, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. providing the interpretation to be given to Part I of chapter 627, Florida Statutes, F. S.A. See also Johnson v. State, 157 Fla. 685, 27 So.2d 276 (1946), Hall v. State, 39 Fla. 637, 23 So. 119 (1897), and Sams v. King, 18 Fla. 557 (1882), to the effect that where the last clause of a statutory section is plainly inconsistent with the first part of the same section, and the first part is consistent with the clear policy and intent of the legislature, the last clause, if operative at all, will be so construed as to give it an effect consistent with the first part of the section and the policy it indicates. 30 Fla.Jur., Statutes, § 114.

STURGIS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur. RAWLS, Chief Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of Section 627.-391(3), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., the last clause of which is patently inconsistent with the first part of the section, Inter-venor’s motion to stay is granted. See Section 627.031, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. providing the interpretation to be given to Part I of chapter 627, Florida Statutes, F. S.A. See also Johnson v. State, 157 Fla. 685, 27 So.2d 276 (1946), Hall v. State, 39 Fla. 637, 23 So. 119 (1897), and Sams v. King, 18 Fla. 557 (1882), to the effect that where the last clause of a statutory section is plainly inconsistent with the first part of the same section, and the first part is consistent with the clear policy and intent of the legislature, the last clause, if operative at all, will be so construed as to give it an effect consistent with the first part of the section and the policy it indicates. 30 Fla.Jur., Statutes, § 114.

STURGIS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur. RAWLS, Chief Judge, dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 So. 2d 901, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-request-for-increase-in-insurance-premiums-by-national-automobile-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack