in Re: Request for Court of Inquiry

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: October 20, 2010
• Docket: 06-10-00191-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                                                ______________________________

                                                             No. 06-10-00191-CR

                         IN RE:  REQUEST FOR COURT OF INQUIRY

                                       On Appeal from the 402th Judicial District Court

                                                             Wood County, Texas

                                                            Trial Court No. 12,169

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                            Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley

                                                     MEMORANDUM  OPINION

            Ricky Williams attempts to appeal the ruling of the 402nd Judicial District Court of Wood County denying his motion to convene a court of inquiry pursuant to Chapter 52 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.  Because the Legislature has not provided a right of appeal, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

            A court of inquiry is a criminal proceeding authorized by and conducted according to Chapter 52 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.  See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 52.01–.09 (Vernon 2006).  When a district judge, acting in his capacity as magistrate, has probable cause to believe an offense has been committed against the laws of this state, he may request that the presiding judge of the administrative judicial district appoint a district judge to commence a court of inquiry.  Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 52.01(a).  The appointed judge may summon and examine any witness in relation to the offense in accordance with the procedural rules established in Chapter 52.  Id.  If it appears from a court of inquiry an offense has been committed, the judge shall issue a warrant for the arrest of the offender as if the complaint had been made and filed.  Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 52.08.  Implicit in the denial of a motion to convene a court of inquiry is a finding by the court presented with such a motion that no probable cause existed that the complained-of offense had been committed.  Chapter 52 does not provide for an appeal from the judge’s determination.  In re Court of Inquiry, No. 06-10-00171-CR, 2010 WL 3894220 (Tex. App.––Texarkana Oct. 6, 2010, no pet. h.); In re Court of Inquiry, 148 S.W.3d 554, 555 (Tex. App.––El Paso 2004, no pet.).  A party may appeal only that which the Legislature has authorized.  Olowosuko v. State, 826 S.W.2d 940, 941 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); McCarver v. State, 257 S.W.3d 512 (Tex. App.––Texarkana 2008, no pet.).

            In the absence of statutory authorization for an appeal from the magistrate’s determination made in connection with the court of inquiry, we conclude that Williams does not have a right of appeal.  Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

                                                                        Bailey C. Moseley

                                                                        Justice

Date Submitted:          October 19, 2010

Date Decided:             October 20, 2010

Do Not Publish