In re Request for an Investigation of Attorneys

957 N.E.2d 233, 460 Mass. 1025, 2011 Mass. LEXIS 1001
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 21, 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petitioner appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court [1026] dismissing her petition for relief in the nature of mandamus. She sought an order compelling the Board of Bar Overseers to cause the Office of the Bar Counsel to reopen disciplinary proceedings against several attorneys as to whom she had filed one or more grievances.1 Her petition was correctly dismissed for the reason stated by the single justice: “A complainant . . . cannot commence a judicial action challenging bar counsel’s decision and seek a judicial order compelling bar counsel to act in a certain way. There simply is no such private right of action.” Matter of a Request for an Investigation of an Attorney, 449 Mass. 1013, 1014 (2007).

The case was submitted on the papers filed, accompanied by a memorandum of law. Julia M. Heath, pro se. Michael Fredrickson for Board of Bar Overseers.

Judgment affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Request for an Investigation of Attorneys, 957 N.E.2d 233, 460 Mass. 1025, 2011 Mass. LEXIS 1001 (Mass. 2011).

957 N.E.2d 233 (In re Request for an Investigation of Attorneys) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related