in Re Repsol and Equinor Royalty Litigation
This text of in Re Repsol and Equinor Royalty Litigation (in Re Repsol and Equinor Royalty Litigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
============ MDL No. 19-0044 ============= IN RE REPSOL AND EQUINOR ROYALTY LITIGATION ======================================================= ORDER OF THE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PANEL ========================================================
PER CURIAM
Repsol Oil & Gas USA, LLC, et al. filed a Motion to Transfer on January 14, 2019.
Respondents, Peggy Baker, et al., filed a Response to the Motion to Transfer and Movants replied.
Having considered all of the pleadings on file, the panel concludes that the Motion should be
denied.
Accordingly, the Motion to Transfer is denied. This denial is without prejudice to the filing
of another Motion to Transfer in the event that additional related cases are filed. See TEX. R.
JUD. ADMIN. 13.2(f).
CHAIR OF THE PANEL PRESIDING JUDGE KELLY G. MOORE, CHIEF JUSTICE
JOSH R. MORRISS III, JUSTICE KEN WISE, AND PRESIDING JUDGES DAVID L. EVANS
AND SID HARLE CONCUR.
PER CURIAM ORDER
ORDER ISSUED: May 6, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Repsol and Equinor Royalty Litigation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-repsol-and-equinor-royalty-litigation-tex-2019.