In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education

703 N.E.2d 324, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1443, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3706
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 17, 1998
StatusPublished

This text of 703 N.E.2d 324 (In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education, 703 N.E.2d 324, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1443, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3706 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

ENTRY

This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(l)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1992-1993 reporting period.

On August 11,1995, this court adopted the recommendation of the commission, imposed a sanction fee upon the respondent, and suspended the respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3) and Gov.Bar R. X(5)(A)(4). The court further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until respondent complies with the requirements for reinstatement set forth in Gov.Bar R. X(7).

On November 25,1998, the commission filed a recommendation pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(7)(B)(2), finding that the respondent has paid all fees assessed for noncompliance, has made up all deficiencies, and is now in full compliance with all requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, and recommending that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. On November 25, 1998, the commission certified that respondent had completed the credit hours of continuing legal education required during his suspension by this court’s order of suspension. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the recommendation of the commission is adopted and respondent, Joseph Henry Blackwell, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law from his suspension under Gov.Bar R. X.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
703 N.E.2d 324, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1443, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-report-of-the-commission-on-continuing-legal-education-ohio-1998.