in Re: Renee Cuellar, Directly and Derivatively on Behalf of 3 Legendary Tigers, LLC D/B/A Tipsy Tiger and D/B/A EPTX

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 30, 2019
Docket08-19-00035-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Renee Cuellar, Directly and Derivatively on Behalf of 3 Legendary Tigers, LLC D/B/A Tipsy Tiger and D/B/A EPTX (in Re: Renee Cuellar, Directly and Derivatively on Behalf of 3 Legendary Tigers, LLC D/B/A Tipsy Tiger and D/B/A EPTX) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Renee Cuellar, Directly and Derivatively on Behalf of 3 Legendary Tigers, LLC D/B/A Tipsy Tiger and D/B/A EPTX, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

' IN RE: RENEE CUELLAR, DIRECTLY No. 08-19-00035-CV AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF ' 3 LEGENDARY TIGERS, LLC D/B/A AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING TIPSY TIGER AND D/B/A EPTX, ' IN MANDAMUS Relator. '

'

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Renee Cuellar, Directly and Derivatively on Behalf of 3 Legendary Tigers, LLC

d/b/a Tipsy Tiger and d/b/a EPTX, has filed a mandamus petition against the Honorable Francisco

X. Dominguez, Judge of the 205th District Court of El Paso County, Texas. Cuellar is challenging

Respondent’s order granting a motion filed by the Receiver, Robert Sandoval, requesting the return

of certain funds. Cuellar also filed a motion to stay the underlying proceedings. The motion for

emergency relief and the petition for writ of mandamus are denied.

Generally, mandamus relief is appropriate only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or to

compel the performance of a ministerial duty, and where the relator has no adequate remedy by

appeal. In re Reece, 341 S.W.3d 360, 364 (Tex. 2011)(orig. proceeding); In re Prudential

Insurance Company of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004)(orig. proceeding). The

burden is on relator to show it is entitled to mandamus relief. See In re Ford Motor Company, 165

S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex. 2005)(orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992)(orig. proceeding). After reviewing the mandamus petition and record, we conclude that

Relator has failed to show that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the

motion for emergency relief and the petition for writ of mandamus.

January 30, 2019 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
In Re Reece
341 S.W.3d 360 (Texas Supreme Court, 2011)
In Re Ford Motor Co.
165 S.W.3d 315 (Texas Supreme Court, 2005)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Renee Cuellar, Directly and Derivatively on Behalf of 3 Legendary Tigers, LLC D/B/A Tipsy Tiger and D/B/A EPTX, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-renee-cuellar-directly-and-derivatively-on-behalf-of-3-legendary-texapp-2019.