in Re Rene Saenz
This text of in Re Rene Saenz (in Re Rene Saenz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 16, 2016
No. 04-16-00585-CV
IN RE Rene SAENZ
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice
On September 14, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered the petition and is of the opinion that Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on September 16, 2016.
_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of September, 2016.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 11-10-16006-CV, styled Ramon Saenz, Javier Saenz and Alvarado Hinojosa v. Rene Saenz, Defendant, Carlos Saenz and Mae Saenz, Intervenors, pending in the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas, the Honorable Richard C. Terrell presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Rene Saenz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rene-saenz-texapp-2016.