In re Remmelink

233 A.D.2d 25, 663 N.Y.S.2d 139, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8806
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 18, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 233 A.D.2d 25 (In re Remmelink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Remmelink, 233 A.D.2d 25, 663 N.Y.S.2d 139, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on August 28, 1989.

[26]*26On February 6, 1997, he pleaded guilty to certain felony charges, as follows: one count of grand larceny in the first degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.42, one count of grand larceny in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.40 (1), and one count of grand larceny in the third degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.35. The respondent was sentenced to, respectively, concurrent terms of 28 months to seven years, one to three years, and one to three years, on April 18, 1997.

By petition dated July 21, 1997, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee is seeking an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b). As the petitioner has been convicted of crimes which are felonies within the meaning of Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (e), he automatically ceased to be an attorney by operation of law upon entry of his guilty plea (Matter of Scott, 222 AD2d 67, 68; Matter of Marchisello, 218 AD2d 214).

Accordingly, the Committee’s petition is granted, and respondent’s name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b).

Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ., Concur.

Petition granted, and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective September 18, 1997.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Silberman
31 A.D.3d 21 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re Mercado
1 A.D.3d 54 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re Watson
282 A.D.2d 96 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re Seader
257 A.D.2d 285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re Vagionis
241 A.D.2d 276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 A.D.2d 25, 663 N.Y.S.2d 139, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-remmelink-nyappdiv-1997.