In Re Reiter

Supreme Court of Vermont

In Re Reiter

241 A.2d 60, 127 Vt. 98, 1968 Vt. LEXIS 182

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided March 14, 1968·No. 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A complaint for disbarment has been presented against this respondent. It alleges that, in Chittenden County'Court, he has pleaded guilty to, and been convicted and sentenced on eleven counts of embezzlement of funds entrusted to his care by others. The respondent has informed this Court that no answer in defense is to be filed. Therefore, the allegations of the complaint are to be taken as confessed. They establish that the respondent has violated his office as an attorney of this Court.

Judgment that Edward B. Reiter is removed from the office of attorney and counsellor at lanv and solicitor in chancery, and his name is stricken from the rolls.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A complaint for disbarment has been presented against this respondent. It alleges that, in Chittenden County'Court, he has pleaded guilty to, and been convicted and sentenced on eleven counts of embezzlement of funds entrusted to his care by others. The respondent has informed this Court that no answer in defense is to be filed. Therefore, the allegations of the complaint are to be taken as confessed. They establish that the respondent has violated his office as an attorney of this Court.

Judgment that Edward B. Reiter is removed from the office of attorney and counsellor at lanv and solicitor in chancery, and his name is stricken from the rolls.

In Re Reiter, 241 A.2d 60, 127 Vt. 98, 1968 Vt. LEXIS 182 (Vt. 1968).

Pincite

241 A.2d 60 (In Re Reiter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related