In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Ward

779 N.W.2d 93, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 105, 2010 WL 816174
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMarch 4, 2010
DocketNo. A09-688
StatusPublished

This text of 779 N.W.2d 93 (In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Ward, 779 N.W.2d 93, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 105, 2010 WL 816174 (Mich. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

On January 6, 2007, we indefinitely suspended petitioner Thomas Robert Ward from the practice of law with no right to petition for reinstatement for one year after satisfaction of a judgment entered against him by a former client. In re Ward, 726 N.W.2d 497, 498 (Minn.2007). Petitioner applied for reinstatement in April 2009 and a hearing on the petition was heard by a panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board. The panel found that petitioner has proven by clear and convincing evidence that he is competent and morally fit to resume the practice of law. See In re Swanson, 343 N.W.2d 662, 664 (Minn.1984) (providing that the burden is on the lawyer to establish by clear and convincing evidence the moral fitness to resume the practice of law). The panel further found that petitioner has complied with Rule 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), has paid costs under Rule 24, RLPR, and is current with continuing legal education requirements. The panel recommended that petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law, upon proof that petitioner has successfully completed the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination, and thereafter be placed on unsupervised probation for two years. Petitioner and the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility concur with the panel’s recommendation.

The court has independently reviewed the file and agrees with the panel’s recommendation.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Thomas Robert Ward shall be reinstated to the active practice of law by further order of the court upon the filing of an affidavit showing that he has successfully completed the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Upon reinstatement, Ward shall be placed on probation for a period of two years from the date of filing of the order for reinstatement, the terms and conditions of which shall be stated in the order for reinstatement.

BY THE COURT:

/§/_

/s/Alán C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Application of Swanson
343 N.W.2d 662 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1984)
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ward
726 N.W.2d 497 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
779 N.W.2d 93, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 105, 2010 WL 816174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reinstatement-to-the-practice-of-law-of-ward-minn-2010.